Everton Over/Under Stats: The Premier League's Under 2.5 Club

Every club gets a reputation in the goals market, but Everton's rests on unusually firm ground. Across 798 Premier League matches from 2005/06–2025/26, only 45.0% went over 2.5 goals. The league rate over the same seasons was 52.3%, so the gap is real and long-lasting.

This file sits behind today's over 2.5 tips as background reading for whenever Everton are on the coupon. The headline answer is that backing the under in every Everton match returned +4.0% at flat stakes. The over returned −13.5%. The under rate of 55.0% gives fair odds of 1.82, and most of the edge came from one specific situation, which the charts below pin down.

Exhibit AEverton finish last of 15 for over 2.5

This chart lines up the 15 clubs with the most Premier League matches in these seasons, ranked by how often their games went over 2.5. Manchester City sit top at 58.0%. Everton sit bottom at 45.0%, ranked 15 of 15, below Crystal Palace and Sunderland and well short of the 52.3% league average.

What strikes me is the sample. Everton and Manchester City have the same 798 matches each, so this is not a small club with a short top-flight spell skewing the table. Over two decades Everton have consistently produced fewer goals than their peers, and I treat that as a club trait rather than a passing phase.

Exhibit BFewer four-goal games, more two-goal games away

Here every Everton match is split by total goals, home and away, against the league mix. At Goodison and since, 26.1% of home games had 0-1 goals and 29.1% had four or more, which sits close to the league's 24.0% and 30.0%. The home profile is only slightly tighter than average.

The away row is where Everton drift. Some 27.6% of away matches had 0-1 goals and 30.3% finished with exactly two, while only 23.8% reached four or more.

For an under bettor, that cluster of two-goal away results matters most. Those are the matches that land the under by a single goal. They also suggest a side that tends to keep things compact on the road instead of trading chances.

Exhibit CThe under paid away, the over lost everywhere

This chart shows flat-stake returns on backing the over or the under, split by venue. At home neither side made money: the over returned −8.3% and the under −1.1%. Away the split widens sharply, with the over at −18.6% and the under at +9.0%.

Combined, that gives the +4.0% under return and −13.5% over return across all matches. Almost all of the under's profit came from away fixtures, which lines up with the goal-total mix in the previous chart.

The caveat I apply to every number here is the same one. These prices come from one bookmaker, and the timing of those prices shifted over the years. A return a few points either side of zero can come from chance alone, and none of this is a betting system to follow blindly.

Exhibit DAs underdogs, Everton matches undershot the priced over

This chart splits Everton's matches into four near-equal groups by their match-winner price. For each group it compares the over 2.5 chance the market priced with how often it actually landed. As short favourites under 1.97, the market was close: 50.0% priced, 50.8% landed, with the over at −3.8% and the under at −5.3% across 197 matches.

The longest group is the one that stands out. With Everton at 3.75+ to win, the market priced the over at 53.2%, but it landed only 43.0% of the time across 207 matches. Backing the under there returned +16.1%, while the over returned −23.2%.

My reading is that the market expects an outmatched Everton to concede freely and push the total up. In practice these games stayed tighter than priced, and the middle two bands also landed below their priced rates at 42.8% and 43.5%. I would still allow for the uncertainty range on the chart, since each band holds only around two hundred matches.

Filed byFreya Linden

I'm Freya Linden, and I write about Over/Under 2.5 goals markets, where the value tends to hide in how sides set up rather than in the headline form table.

View profile →